Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. Tassone
California Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceCompton, J.
—I concur in a reversal of the judgment but must respectfully dissent from the majority .decision to award Raleigh an interest in that part of the inventory which consists of replacement items.
*709The two opinions which comprise the majority give some evidence of the difficulties we have encountered in attempting to effect a resolution in this case. The majority perceives a potential for fraud in the way in which Tassone conducted himself and thus have, in my opinion, misapplied the clear provisions of the California Uniform Commercial Code in an effort to reach a result which is “commercially…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Grover v. TindallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Lawrence Holzman v. L. H. J. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973