Ingram v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Washington District Cowrt. Action in the name of The State upon a recognizance taken in a criminal case to recover the amount of the penalty.
Read the full summary
Error from, Washington District Cowrt. Action in the name of The State upon a recognizance taken in a criminal case to recover the amount of the penalty. The petition alleged that one Daniel A. Ingram had been brought before a justice of the peace on a charge of grand larceny, had waived his right to a preliminary examination on said charge, had been required to give bail in the sum of $500 for his appearance to the district court, etc., and in default of bail had been committed; that afterward the defendants Edward Ingram, J. (7., Ilebbard, and J. B. Snider, as sureties for said Daniel A.…
1Opinion of the Court
*635The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action on an instrument in writing claimed to be a criminal recognizance. The action was brought by the county attorney of Washington county in the name of the State against Edward Ingram, J. C. Hebbard and J. B. Snider, who appear to have executed the said instrument in writing as sureties for the appearance of D. A. Ingram at the next term of the district court of said county to answer to the charge of grand larceny. The defendants (now plaintiffs in error) claim that the said instrument is void upon its face for the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Barkley v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Tillson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- United States v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.