Martin v. Kennecott Copper Corp.
District Court, W.D. Washington
At Caw. Action by Mike Martin against the Kennecott Copper Corporation. On motion by defendant to strike denials filed by plaintiff to the answer and for judgment on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the Court
NKTERKR, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant damages for injuries received while being employed in the mine of the defendant in Alaska, alleging negligence on the part of the defendant. The defendant answers with certain denials and admissions, and pleads affirmatively chapter 71, Session Daws of the Territorial Legislature of Alaska for the year 1915, commonly called the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Alaska, praying that the said law be declared the law of this case, and that by virtue of section 22 of said act the plaintiff be declared not entitled to maintain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Smith v. CondrySupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Raymond v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DusablonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leader Specialty Co. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
- McPhail v. Latouche Packing Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1931
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Ferguson v. Ram Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Davis v. P. E. Harris & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.