Legal Opinion

McPhail v. Latouche Packing Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 17, 1931No. C-452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, District Judge.

This action was brought by Jemima Mearns McPhail, plaintiff, to recover from Latouche Packing Company, defendant, compensation for the death of her husband, Robert McPhail, who died February 10, 1928, as the result of injuries received by him arising out of and in the course of his employment by the defendant. It is admitted that neither party to the action has elected to reject the provi*300sions of the Workmen’s Compensation Acts of Alaska. Plaintiff alleges that defendant has paid her $5,460, and under the provisions of chapter 77 of the Laws of Alaska of 1927 she is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Sherman v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Fowler v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Polk v. Western Bedding Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API