Ferguson v. Ram Enterprises, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The issue presented in this Rule 9, Tenn. R.App.P. interlocutory appeal is whether our decision in Five Star Express, Inc. v. Davis, 866 S.W.2d 944 (Tenn.1993) mandates that venue for worker’s compensation cases be determined solely by Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-225(c)(l) — the worker’s compensation venue statute — or whether, in some circumstances, venue may be determined by the general venue statute for transitory actions — Tenn.Code Ann. § 20-4-101(a)?
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts pertinent to this appeal are not disputed. The plaintiff Charles Ferguson, a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chambers v. Sanford and TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Texas Pipe Line Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Logan v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Five Star Express, Inc. v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Floyd v. Vicksburg Cooperage Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hawkins v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Barton Hawkins v. Dept of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002