Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Judge Pamela J. White

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 2017No. 5m/16PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Opinion

In this case, we must decide—initially—whether there is any mechanism for this Court to review the fundamental fairness of a proceeding conducted by the Commission on Judicial Disabilities (“Commission”) when the Commission disciplines a judge in the sole manner in which the Constitution authorizes it to do without referring the matter to this Court. We hold that there is such a mechanism—the common law writ of mandamus. Our review in this particular case awaits the provision by the Commission of the record of its proceedings.

I

Background

A. Discipline or Removal of Judges

The State…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Hecht v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Hon. Pamela J. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. In the Matter of the Hon. Mary C. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Green v. Comm'n on Judicial DisabilitiesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Ademiluyi v. AlbrightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  5. Ademiluyi v. AlbrightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API