In the Matter of Hon. Pamela J. White
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
We must decide whether proceedings before the Maryland Commission on Judicial Disabilities ("Commission") violated a judge's due process rights. As we explained last year, although we have no appellate jurisdiction to review a judge's exceptions to the Commission's determination to issue a public reprimand after public charges and a contested hearing, the common law writ of mandamus provides an avenue for a judge to challenge the fundamental fairness of the proceedings before the Commission. Matter of White , 451 Md. 630 , 649-50, 155 A.3d 463 (2017) (per curiam) [hereinafter White I ]. We…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. UcheomumuCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- In the Matter of the Hon. Mary C. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- In the Matter of the Hon. Mary C. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018