United States v. Twelve Miscellaneous Firearms
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Claimant F.J. Vollmer & Company, Inc. and Claimant Kenneth L. Nevius’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaints filed in the above captioned cases.
To sustain a dismissal of a complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the Court must take all well-pleaded complaints as true and construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). “The issue is not whether Plaintiff will prevail but whether…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Earl Roy Cooper v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi and Leflore County, Mississippi, Earl Roy Cooper v. City of Greenwood, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Ninety-Three (93) Firearms, and Assorted Firearm Parts and Ammunition, Larry Z. Short, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Fourteen Various FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- United States v. Fourteen Various FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- United States v. Twelve FirearmsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- United States v. Miscellaneous Firearms, Explosives, Destructive Devices & AmmunitionDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.