Legal Opinion

United States v. Miscellaneous Firearms, Explosives, Destructive Devices & Ammunition

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 8, 2001No. 00-3035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

This is a peripheral sequel to United States v. Fleischli 119 F.Supp.2d 819 (C.D.Ill.2000).

More specifically, it is a civil forfeiture action.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 11, 1998, agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms (“ATF”) seized firearms and ammunition from the home of Joseph and Donna Fleischli at 1119 South MacArthur and from Mr. Fleischli’s business at 1905 East Washington. Various explosives and other items were also seized from Mr. Fleischli’s business.

On October 16, 1998, Donna Fleischli— the Claimant here — timely filed a claim as to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Keith D. Schacht v. Wisconsin Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Jane C. Vollmert v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Fourteen Various FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ninety-Three (93) Firearms, and Assorted Firearm Parts and Ammunition, Larry Z. Short, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Assorted FirearmsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  3. United States v. Sixty FirearmsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API