Legal Opinion

LaLacker v. Stuckey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1963No. Gen. 10,435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This is an action under the Paternity Act. The cause was tried before the court without a jury and the court held the defendant was the father of the plaintiff’s child. Thereafter, defendant filed his motion to reopen the ease and to allow the defendant to testify. The motion was denied and the defendant appeals the judgment finding the defendant the father of the child and the order denying the motion to reopen. Defendant’s theory on appeal is that plaintiff failed to prove her case; that defendant was deprived of a jury trial and the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for leave to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greer v. Carter Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Warner v. GosnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Page v. KeevesIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hall v. PittengerIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Weisberg v. United States Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Cizek v. AzzarelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People Ex Rel. Jones v. SchmittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. People v. RimicciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. People v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API