Ruttle v. What Cheer Coal Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Sharpe, J. Assumpsit by Charles S. Ruttle against the What Cheer Coal Mining Company for services rendered. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The record of a former trial of this cause was before this court, and the judgment for the plaintiff was reversed. 153 Mich. 300 (117 N. W. 168). The contentions there presented are stated in the opinion then handed down. Upon the second trial there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and it is said in the brief for appellant, that the facts were nearly identical upon both trials. None of our former rulings are questioned. The errors for which the former judgment was reversed were the ruling of the trial judge in refusing defendant the privilege of showing the extent and character…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Apsey v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Curtiss v. CurtissMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Ruttle v. What Cheer Coal Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Palazzolo v. SackettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931