Hastings Industrial Co. v. Moran
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Huron; Beach, J. Assumpsit by the Hastings Industrial Company against James Moran for an unpaid subscription to the capital stock of a corporation. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff is an Illinois corporation. On April 3,1903, it entered into a contract with the de*680fendant and others, severally, to construct and equip a canning factory at Port Austin in this State according to certain plans, specifications, terms, and conditions, set forth in the contract, and defendant promised, in consideration thereof, to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $100. Plaintiff had not filed its articles of association with the secretary of State, but on May 27, 1903, it fully complied with the requirements of the statute in that regard. It began the construction of the plant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coit & Co. v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Oakland Sugar Mill Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Union Trust Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- American Insurance v. StoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Heffron v. DalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Fertilizer Co. v. Fall River Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Imperial Curtain Co. v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Haughton Elevator & Machine Co. v. Detroit Candy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Power Specialty Co. v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.