Legal Opinion
Goldenberg v. Sebersky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 3, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 596 (1954)
105 A.2d 700
MICHAEL GOLDENBERG, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MAX SEBERSKY, A/K/A MAX SEBERSKY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court, Law Division.
Decided June 3, 1954.
Mr. Robert G. Leff, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Michael E. Grant, attorney for defendant.
GAULKIN, J.C.C.
Defendant moves for an order "striking the complaint * * * and dismissing the action on the ground that the complaint was not sufficiently or legally served."
At best, improper service ordinarily authorizes no more than the setting aside of the service. Colon v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, 27 N.J.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bishop v. VoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Attorney General v. Algonquin ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Igoe Bros. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. BoykoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Colon v. Pennsylvania Greyhound LinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gaines v. Monroe Calculating MacH. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Byrd v. Ontario Freight Lines Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- First National Bank of Freehold v. VivianiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Rogers v. DubacNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Cooke v. YarringtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973