Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 5, 1984No. Civ. A. H-81-1433, H-82-3253PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DeANDA, District Judge.
This cause having been tried upon the facts without a jury, the Court hereby enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, pursuant to Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Plaintiffs are licensed physicians who have been employed by the Defendant Baylor College of Medicine (“Baylor”) as anesthesiologists during periods of time which are material to this lawsuit.
2. Plaintiff Lawrence Abrams (“Abrams”) began employment for Baylor at the Fondren-Brown Cardiovascular Unit of the Methodist Hospital…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metal Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Blair v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Whitten v. Farmland Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Pamela E. Long v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.