Pamela E. Long v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
Pamela Long appeals a summary judgment in favor of Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus on her claim for sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. At issue is whether a claimant can maintain a civil action against a private employer after conciliation efforts have failed because the claimant believed that the proposed conciliation agreement did not offer full relief. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for de novo consideration of the merits of Long’s claim.
I
The facts, taken…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kelli Lyn Metz, and v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Rosemary B. Greenlaw v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary, Department of the Navy B.J. McMillin Richard B. Cheney, Secretary, Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- DiPaulo v. PotterDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Murphy-Taylor v. HofmannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Brown v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.