Legal Opinion
State Bank of Standish v. Curry
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1993No. 92311, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We granted leave in this case to determine whether there was sufficient evidence of a clear and definite promise to support a claim for relief on the theory of promissory estoppel. After careful review of the record, we find that there was. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the Court of Appeals. We *79reinstate the jury’s verdict in favor of the Currys and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
i
Robert and Kathleen Curry are dairy farmers. Beginning in 1975, the Currys annually obtained funds from the State Bank of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wheeler v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Malaker Corp. Stockholders Protective Committee v. First Jersey National BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Jamestowne on Signal, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Silvia J. Thomas v. Chancey Miller and Elmwood CemeteryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Novak v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Derderian v. Genesys Health Care SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.