Legal Opinion
Reilly v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 2, 2012No. 11-788CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER 1
WHEELER, Judge.
This bid protest involves the allegations of Plaintiff, Clinton Reilly that he was wrongly excluded from competing for a General Services Administration (“GSA”) building lease in Sacramento, California. The leased space was to house a Military Entrance Processing Station for the Department of Defense. Mr. Reilly has leased his building to the GSA for *71this purpose since 1995 and is the incumbent lessor. Mr. Reilly claims that the GSA acted arbitrarily when it excluded him from competing for the new lease based upon a setback requirement, which the GSA later…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Myers Investigative and Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Labatt Food Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Aircraft Charter Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- InSpace 21 LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- National Telecommuting Institute, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- IHS Global Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.