Legal Opinion

Alaska Construction & Engineering, Inc. v. Balzer Pacific Equipment Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2006No. S-11168, S-11225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Construction & Engineering, Inc. (ACE) leased various pieces of equipment from Balzer Pacific Equipment Company (Balzer). When ACE stopped making rental payments, Balzer sued for breach of contract and sought prejudgment delivery of the equipment. Balzer was allowed to retrieve its equipment after putting up a bond. The jury returned a verdict for Balzer on its breach of contract claims, rejected ACE’s affirmative defenses, and awarded ACE $10,000 on one of its counterclaims. Post-trial, the superior court ruled that: (1) Bal-zer was the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Casey v. Semco Energy, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sidney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Luker v. SykesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lee v. SheldonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Luker v. SykesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API