Legal Opinion

Luker v. Sykes

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2015No. 7059 S-14744/S-14763PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

+A property owner sued neighboring property owners, claiming that he had access rights across their land because of both an express easement and a right of way created by federal law. He also sought damages for a number of alleged torts. Following trial, the superior court found that both the express casement and the federally created right of way existed but found against the easement holder on all his tort claims. The owners of the burdened property appealed the finding of a federally created right of way, and the easement holder eross-appealed the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. American National Watermattress Corp. v. ManvilleAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Chotard v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Windel v. CarnahanAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Pederson v. Arctic Slope Regional CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Gavora, Inc. v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API