Legal Opinion
Yeoman v. Sawyer
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1950No. Civ. 7738PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Anna Marie Yeoman, as administratrix of the estate of Carl Heekart, deceased, commenced this action to quiet title to certain real property situated in Butte County, the complaint containing the usual allegations of such an action. Defendant Edith Sawyer, also known as Edith Heekart, filed an answer denying the principal allegations of the complaint, and in addition cross-complained to quiet title in herself, alleging that she and the deceased, Carl Heekart, had taken title to the property as joint tenants by a deed dated January 2, 1947; and that by a decree of the Superior Court of Butte…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- McDonald v. MorleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of Coffee v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bucholtz v. BelsheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 53 soc.sec.rep.ser. 461, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 45,411, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4279, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7175 Charlotte Bucholtz California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, a Non-Profit Corporation v. Kimberly Belshe, Director, Gerald Rohlfes, Chief of the Third Party Liability Branch of the California Department of Health Services John Rodriguez, Chief Deputy Director of Programs of the California Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997