Legal Opinion

Reid v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The plaintiff, T. A. Reid, instituted this action against the defendants, Wentworth & Irwin, Ine., hereinafter to be referred to as the defendant corporation, and F. W. Turnbow, to recover damages for the alleged conversion by the defendants of a truck and trailer, also a set of tire chains and a set of tools, alleged to be the property of plaintiff. The case was tried to the court and a jury, resulting in a judgment of involuntary nonsuit as to the defendant F. W. Turnbow and a .directed verdict in favor of the defendant corporation. From the judgment entered on the directed verdict the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barber v. Motor Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Metheny v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Peterson v. Hailey National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Harrison v. BealsOregon Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ATLAS HOTEL SUPPLY COMPANY v. BaneyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Salishan Hills, Inc. v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Epton v. Moskee Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Smith v. OWENOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Reid v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API