Legal Opinion

Smith v. OWEN

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action on a promissory note in which judgment was recovered by the plaintiff after a jury trial and the defendants have appealed.

The note is dated June 28, 1951, is in the principal sum of $12,772.50, is made payable in five installments to the National Bank of Commerce of Seattle at its Yakima Branch in Yakima, Washington, contains an acceleration clause, and was signed by “Earl Owen, Partner,” under the words “Earl Owen and Leonard Wormdahl, Partners.” Execution of the note grew out of the purchase by the defendants from Central Chain and Transmission Company, a Washington…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Buckman v. Hill Military AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Harrison v. BealsOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Muzny v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Reid v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Renard v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Zerkel v. LindseyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. CIA. Estrella Blanca, LTDA. v. S.S. NICTRICDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  5. Salishan Hills, Inc. v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API