McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Trust
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from the order denying defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Both parties are corporations. Plaintiff was a retail dealer of Nash automobiles at Duluth. Defendant was in the business of financing automobile dealers. Plaintiff sues defendant for the conversion of six automobiles which were in plaintiff’s place of business on December 1, 1930, and which with plaintiff’s consent defendant moved to another garage in the city, but which were the next day, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent, sold and removed to Superior,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re A. E. Fountain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HupferNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Commercial Credit Co. v. Schlegel-Storseth Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Humphreys v. Minnesota Clay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Motor Bankers Corp. v. C. I. T. Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Handy v. C. I. T. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Glenn P. Maulding v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Microsoft Corp. v. Ion Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Molenaar v. United Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.