Wendall v. Osborne & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Keokuk District Court. Action upon a contract warranting a certain reaping and mowing machine, purchased by plaintiff of defendants. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff'. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The amended petition, upon which the cause was tried, declares upon a warranty which was signed by defendants, and was attached to or was a part of the order given by plaintiff for the machine in question. The amended abstract, which is not denied, and must, therefore, be considered as correct, alleges that the order and contract of warranty are in the possession of defendant, and cannot, for that reason, be set out by copy in the petition. The defendants in their answer admit that they are manufacturers of reapers and mowers, and that plaintiff gave the order named in the petition. Other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris Manufacturing Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Bayliss v. HennesseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murphy v. Russell & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
- Davis' Sons v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Briggs v. M. Rumely Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Kingman & Co. v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. BrowerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.