Legal Opinion
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Brower
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 26, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. J. H. Appelgate, Judge. Action against the defendant for the price of a harvester. The defense was a breach of warranty. There was a jury trial resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
July 3,1889, the defendant entered into the following written contract:
“McCormick Harvesting Machine Company will ship for the undersigned on or before July 10, 1889, one of their latest improved 5-foot H. binders, including the usual extras, consigned to the care of Gr. M. Armfield, at Redfield, the undersigned agreeing to pay the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company $130 cash, with interest thereon at the rate of-per cent. per annum from date until due, and at the rate of-per cent, thereafter until paid. These machines are all warranted to be well made, of good material, and durable with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. TowsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Pitsinowsky v. Beardsley, Hill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Russell & Co. v. MurdockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Warder v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Wendall v. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. E. B. Hall & Keating Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Ruthven Bros. v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Parsons Band Cutter & Self Feeder Co. v. MallingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Allen v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.