Murphy v. Russell & Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perces County. There can be no rescission of a contract of sale for a breach of a warranty when there is no fraud. '(Pierce v. Wilson, 34 Ala. 596; Foster v. Gressett, 29 Ala. 393; Bien v. Bea/r River etc. Water Min. Go., 20 Cal. 602, 81 Am. Dec. 132; Soper v. Sevens, 14 Me. 133; Fairis■ v. Ware, 60 Me. 482; Perkins v. Bailey, 89 Mass. 61, 96 Am. Dec. 689; Hoopes v. Strasburger, 37 Md. 390, 11 Am.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perces County. There can be no rescission of a contract of sale for a breach of a warranty when there is no fraud. '(Pierce v. Wilson, 34 Ala. 596; Foster v. Gressett, 29 Ala. 393; Bien v. Bea/r River etc. Water Min. Go., 20 Cal. 602, 81 Am. Dec. 132; Soper v. Sevens, 14 Me. 133; Fairis■ v. Ware, 60 Me. 482; Perkins v. Bailey, 89 Mass. 61, 96 Am. Dec. 689; Hoopes v. Strasburger, 37 Md. 390, 11 Am. Eep. 538; Poor v. Woodburn, 25 Yt. 234; Mauchan v. Boys, 52 N. H. 232; Kinney v. Kierman, 2 Lans. 492; Haitze v. Collins, 46 Pa. St. 268; Short v. Stevenson, 63 Pa.…
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
— This action was brought, under the provisions of section 3396 of the Revised Statutes, to contest the respondents’ rights to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and to contest the amount claimed to be due thereon.
The facts out of which it arose are substantially as follows: "Russell & Co., of Massilon, Ohio, manufacturers and dealers in threshing machinery, had a local agency at Lewiston, Idaho, and through their agent there sold to the appellant a threshing outfit, consisting of a separator, wind-stacker, an engine, beltings, trucks, tanks, Jackson feeder, Jackson blocks, Cyclone auger-bagger,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Caldwell v. RuddyIdaho Supreme Court · 1881
- Palmer v. BanfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Russell & Co. v. MurdockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Furneaux v. EsterlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Best Manufacturing Co. v. HuttonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Panhandle Lumber Co. v. RancourIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Harshbarger v. EbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.