Briggs v. M. Rumely Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge. Action at law to recover for the .breach of warranty of a threshing machine sold by the defendant to the plaintiffs. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
*2051 *203I. The defendant manufactures threshing machines at La Porte, in the state of Indiana. On the twenty-ninth day of July, 1892, the plaintiff purchased a machine of defendant, from one of its agents, at Cedar Rapids, in this state. The contract was in the form of an order for the machine, and the price agreed to be paid was seven hundred and eight dollars, and the freight on the machine from La Porte to Esttherville in this state. The part of the contract material to be considered in determining the case is as follows: "The undersigned hereby agrees to fully settle for the foregoing machinery…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wendall v. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Conkling v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Lake v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Casley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.