Legal Opinion
Dillon v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1928No. Nos. 5586, 5587PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In point of fact and legal status the two cases are substantially identical, and for the sake of brevity we shall therefore refer only to the first.
On August 5,1924, the appellant filed his complaint under the Sealing Claims Act of June 7, 1924, 43 Stat. 595 (28 USCA § 52). Whitelaw v. United States (D. C.) 9 F.(2d) 103; United States v. Laflin (C. C. A.) 24 F. (2d) 683; Bird v. United States (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 933. The customary deposit was made for costs, and summons issued. The clerk’s records disclose no other proceeding until January 11, 1926, when, acting under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- S. M. Hamilton Coal Co. v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Bird v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Whitelaw v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- United States v. Sixty-Five Cases of Glove LeatherDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Ex Parte AltmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Barger v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Cage v. CageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Tinkoff v. Jarecki, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.