Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Altman
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 17, 1940No. 14428-YPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
Jack Altman, the defendant, seeks by writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from custody on a warrant of removal ordering him removed for trial to the Eastern District of Michigan. He asserts that the warrant was illegally issued, because the indictment on which it was predicated is not a valid, subsisting indictment, as it has been dismissed, as to him, by the Court in which it was returned.
The indictment was returned on December 18, 1936, in the Eastern District of Michigan. On January 18, 1937, the defendant was ordered removed from Los Angeles. On January 26,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Vivianne Jade Washington v. Investigator Hugh HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Andrew FureyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.