Legal Opinion
Pultz v. Holgerson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1986No. Civ. 26157PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
Plaintiff Betty Pultz appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Harry Holgerson in this negligence action. We will reverse the judgment.
Facts and Procedural Background
Plaintiff sued Holgerson for injuries incurred when she slipped and fell on the sidewalk abutting his property. The complaint alleges seriatim, by paragraph, that: (115) plaintiff “was walking on the sidewalk of the property of defendant] when due to the negligence of the defendants in failing to keep said sidewalk in a safe condition in accordance with Civil Code § 1714, she fell and sustained…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Juge v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.