Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Boulevard Express

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1926No. Docket No. 4829PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

We are considering here three cases which were tried together by stipulation before a jury. They are all against the same defendants, but each by different plaintiffs. They are actions for damages incurred in an automobile accident in which defendants were charged with negligence, resulting in the damages complained of.

On the trial a nonsuit was granted in, favor of defendant Q. R. Siglin, and a verdict was rendered in favor of Marguerite Lloyd against defendant Boulevard Express a copartnership, and defendant Mitchell for twenty-five thousand dollars, and a verdict was rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Brokaw v. Black-Foxe Military InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Bradley Min. Co. v. BoiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Broome v. Kern Valley Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API