Legal Opinion
Potts v. Maryland Games, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 27, 2019No. 8:18-cv-03250Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (SOUTHERN DIVISION) KRISTEN H. POTTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. CBD-18-3250 ) MARYLAND GAMES, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiff’s Motion”)(ECF 54). The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion and the opposition thereto. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md.). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion. I. Standard for Review A court may grant summary judgment, Awhen the pleadings, depositions,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.