Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1976No. 47PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

In its first assignment of error appellant challenges the decision of the Commission to consolidate the Military Service classification (MS) with other classes into the new G-3 schedule.

Appellant concedes, and we agree, that it is not présently hurt by the reclassification- with respect to the increased rates which it will be required to pay. As noted, the Utilities Commission has adopted a reclassification program designed (1) to bring customer rates into closer alignment with costs of providing service and (2) to simplify existing schedules. The Commission’s recent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. Cannon Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Application of Hawaii Elec. Light Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API