Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Murphy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1953No. 32439PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mallery, J.—The

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal sustaining a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.

The plaintiff, a fifty-five-year-old married man, was employed at the Bayside Iron Works in a supervisory capacity, which required him to make himself heard above the din of operations in the machine shops.

In November, 1948, he called at the office of the defendant, Dr. Albert Murphy, for an examination to determine the cause of an excessive amount of phlegm in his throat. His voice was “perfectly fine and normal.” He was able to sing and to carry on his work…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Helland v. BridenstineWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cornwell v. SleicherWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Derr v. BonneyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Olson v. WeitzWashington Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. ZeBarth v. Swedish Hospital Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Horner v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'n Hospitals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API