Legal Opinion

Colagrossi v. Hendrickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1957No. 33848PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Plaintiff brings this action upon a promissory note for $5,500 against L. W. Hendrickson, Geraldine M. Nadreau, and the community composed of Geraldine M. Na-dreau and her husband. The note did not bear interest; it was not signed by Mr. Nadreau.

Mr. Hendrickson and Mrs. Nadreau admitted borrowing $3,000 from plaintiff; admitted the execution of the promissory note for $5,500; and pleaded that $2,500, represented by the promissory note, constituted usury.

Mr. Nadreau’s answer denied his wife’s authority to execute the note on his behalf or on behalf of their marital community; he alleged that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Abbott v. WetherbyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Arthurs v. National Postal Transport Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Beakley v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Reid v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. In re the Marriage of MuellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Gleason v. Metropolitan Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Moen v. Hull (In Re Hull)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API