Vidler v. De Bell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent in an action brought to recover a broker’s commission upon the sale of real property belonging to appellants.
This is the second trial of this suit. The first trial resulted in judgment for defendants, but a motion for new trial was granted on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. Following the second trial, a memorandum decision was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and the court directed plaintiff to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance therewith. Judgment was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Roth v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Virtue v. FlyntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Aguirre v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Duval v. DuvalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Justice v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Prahm v. Pickford Real Estate CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.