Legal Opinion

State v. Wolfs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. 10-88-01844; CA A60331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

This criminal case was remanded from the Supreme Court for us to review defendant’s assignments of error that we did not reach in our previous opinion, State v. Wolfs, 105 Or App 5, 803 P2d 1192 (1990). In that opinion, we reversed defendant’s conviction for being an exconvict in possession of a firearm, former ORS 166.270, because his second trial was barred on the ground of former jeopardy. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that defendant’s second trial was not statutorily or constitutionally barred. State v. Wolfs, 312 Or 646, 826 P2d 623 (1992). We now address defendant’s other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bergsvik v. BergsvikOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. WolfsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Sager v. MaassDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API