Legal Opinion
Sager v. Maass
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 22, 1995No. CV 92-1110-PAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Petitioner Donald Gordon Sager petitions for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and moves for an evidentiary hearing. Respondent Manfred Maass opposes the petition.
I deny petitioner’s motion for an evidentia-ry hearing and grant his petition for habeas relief. Respondent must either retry petitioner within ninety days or release him.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner was convicted of robbing Robert Lee Wieberdink at gunpoint in Salem, Oregon. The conviction cannot stand because petitioner’s trial attorney was ineffective and petitioner was not warned about the dangers…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowling v. ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2001
- Lee v. LampertDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Manfred MAASS, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Meister v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- Sager v. MaassDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995