Legal Opinion

State v. Hambrick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 2003No. 200117739; A117314Published

1Opinion of the Court

75 P.3d 462 (2003)

189 Or. App. 310

STATE of Oregon, Appellant,

v.

Scott Vincent HAMBRICK, Respondent.

200117739; A117314.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 29, 2003.

Decided August 20, 2003.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Daniel Q. O'Dell, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG[*] and SCHUMAN, Judges.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendant was charged by indictment with two…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. LelandOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API