Legal Opinion

Kirchhof v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1952No. 48842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

Plaintiffs sue to recover $14,593.58 on behalf of the F. J. Kirchhof Construction Company, and $7,798.58 on behalf of Kirchhof’s subcontractors, representing extra-labor costs incurred in the performance of a lump-sum construction contract entered into with defendant on November 30, 1945, for the remodeling and extension of the United States Mint at Denver, Colorado. The increased costs resulted from payment by plaintiffs of wage rates to certain classifications of laborers and mechanics employed on the project which were higher than the rates specified in the contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sunswick Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Irwin & Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Black, Raber-Kief & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Morrison-Hardeman-Perini-Leavell v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API