Legal Opinion
Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 18, 1962No. 141-57PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This is a suit for $193,637.95, additional expenses alleged to have been incurred by plaintiff in the performance of a contract for the construction of a power house and appurtenant structures at the Clark Hill Project in Georgia and South Carolina.
Under the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C.A. § 276a et seq.), plaintiff was required to pay not less than the prevailing wage rate in the vicinity of the project, as determined by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, for a short period of time, plaintiff was not only required to pay not less than this minimum wage rate but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
- Lewis v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sunswick Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.