Legal Opinion
Cappelmann v. Young
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 13, 1946No. Civ. 12900PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATTERIDGE, J. pro tem.
Defendant’s appeal is from a judgment rendered against him for $330 for unpaid rent which the trial court found to be due plaintiff under the terms of a written contract containing all the essentials of a valid lease. Plaintiff also filed a cross-appeal “from so much of that certain judgment ... as fails to award plaintiff eight months’ rent . . . found to have accrued in Finding IV, and so much thereof as fails to award to plaintiff the $300 damages found to have been suffered by plaintiff in Finding VII.” These interrelated appeals will be, to some extent, separately…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gavina v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Keating v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Pacific Improvement Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Store Properties, Inc. v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First National Mortgage Co. v. Federal Realty Investment TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Larwin-Southern California, Inc. v. JGB Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re Storage Technology Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Grubb v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Julien v. GossnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.