Legal Opinion

Lochetta v. Cunningham Cab Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1929No. Appeal 222PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

We are obliged to sustain the fifth and sixth assignments of error and send this case back for another trial, because of the court’s instructions to the jury as to which of two motor vehicles approaching a street intersection at right angles has the right of way.

The Act of June 30, 1919, P. L. 678, 695, re-enacted in 1925, P. L. 279, provides, “"When two vehicles approach the intersection of two public highways at the same time, the vehicle approaching from the right shall have the right of way.” This was construed in Weber v. Greenebaum, 270 Pa. 382, 385, to mean: “That,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Redmond v. KoonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Hegarty v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Weinberg v. PavittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Curry v. WillsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Barton v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API