Legal Opinion

State v. Tunstall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993No. 61512PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

In this jury-tried case, defendant, Arlan-ders Tunstall, appeals from convictions of second-degree robbery in violation of § 569.030 RSMo 1986 and third-degree sexual abuse in violation of § 566.120 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced as a prior, persistent, and class X offender to concurrent terms of twenty-eight years’ imprisonment on the robbery charge and six months’ imprisonment on the sexual abuse charge. We affirm.

Viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence adduced at trial established the following facts. Late in the evening of June 20, 1990,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. OverstreetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. State v. SimsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. IvyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. SahakianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. BlanchardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API