Legal Opinion

Putka v. City of Parma

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1993No. 61775PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

I

Appellants, the city of Parma (“the city”) and Lee Janotta, appeal the denial of their summary judgment motion and the verdict of the jury in a wrongful death action filed by appellees, Andrew C. Putka, executor of the estate of Katharina Rostas, deceased, and the next of kin of Katharina Rostas: Margrita, Judith, Stanley, and Jack. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

II

Lee Janotta, an employee of the city, on August 30, 1989, was operating a city backhoe No. 10 vehicle, Model 680 H Construction King. The backhoe struck and killed Katharina Rostas. The vehicle is used…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Morris v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Smedley v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mitchell v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Rodger v. McDonald's Restaurants of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Butler v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hall v. Fort Frye Local School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Muenchenbach v. Preble CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Drake-Lassie v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. King v. Rubber City Arches, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API