Legal Opinion
Skrobot v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 17, 1975No. 338-74PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKtjNzig, Judge
In this civilian pay suit, plaintiff, a Defense Supply-Agency (Agency) employee, asks the court to reverse a ruling by the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Review (BAR) denying his request for promotion from GS-13 to GS-14 and corresponding back pay. Plaintiff had urged that the assignment of temporary additional work entitled him to the higher position. Because we hold that plaintiff fails to demonstrate a legal right to promotion and that the BAR’s decision was in no way arbitrary and capricious, we conclude that plaintiff is not entitled to recover.
The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- James E. Haynes v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Doggett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Tierney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Peters v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donovan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Qualls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Troutman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- McKenzie v. CallowayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Smith v. Contreras-SweetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.