Doggett v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This simple case could be disposed of by order instead of signed opinion except that it involves the important question of whether plaintiff has a clear-cut legal entitlement to the pay of an office to which he claims he should have been promoted. The case is before us on cross motions for summary judgment and there is no issue as to any relevant fact. We conclude that the promotion remained discretionary and the plaintiff cannot recover. In discussing plaintiff’s contentions to the extent we do, we assume arguendo that our jurisdiction extends that far.
The plaintiff was and is a Postal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Cooper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Skaradowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Abruzzo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Terrence L. Adkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Gregory C. Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.