Legal Opinion
Peters v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 17, 1975No. 470-73PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge
The basic problem in this fro se civilian pay case is whether the Associate General Counsel of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is entitled to the higher pay and retirement benefits of Deputy General Counsel because he was not promoted to the higher post as a result of alleged arbitrary and capricious action by the Civil Service Commission (CSC). We hold the actions of the CSC not to have been arbitrary and capricious.
The matter comes before the court on defendant’s and plaintiff’s cross motions for summary judgment. The facts are not complicated and are basically non-contested.
In…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Doggett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Tierney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Steuer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Bielec v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Goutos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Featheringill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.