Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Commonwealth Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1997No. 0319PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

We are asked to determine whether a mortgagor who is obligated by a mortgage to maintain insurance on the mortgaged property can establish a cause of action in promissory estoppel based upon an oral promise made by the mortgagee to obtain insurance. We find no merit in those portions of the instant ease sounding in fraud and breach of contract. We conclude, nevertheless, that a mortgagee’s promise to obtain insurance can be actionable on a theory of promissory es-toppel. Accordingly, on this appeal from the order granting summary judgment to the mortgagee, we affirm in part,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Hunger v. Grand Central SanitationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Thatcher's Drug Store of West Goshen, Inc. v. Consolidated Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Cardamone v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Sullivan v. Chartwell Investment Partners, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Miami Valley Mobile Health Services, Inc. v. ExamOne Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Ira G. Steffy & Son, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API