Legal Opinion

People v. Marino

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1968No. Gen. 50,956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adesko

The above-named defendants were indicted for the offense of theft in that they knowingly obtained and exerted unauthorized control over certain property of the Louis Zahn Drug Company, intending to permanently deprive the owner of the use and benefit of said property in violation of the Criminal Code. (Ill Rev Stats 1963, c 38, § 16-1 (a).) Upon trial by jury, Robert Vaughn was found not guilty. The other four were found guilty as charged. Marino has filed a separate appeal, No. 51,023. Eago, Monteleone and Pettit, who will at times be collectively referred to as “defendants” prosecute this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. The People v. WesleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. MarinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. State v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. People v. ValdezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API